Disagreements interest me.
This post is similar to a previous post of mine - which you should refer to for more depth if you are concerned with my logic.
I think disagreements tell me what you hold to be valuable. Though – the person who refuses to disagree
with anyone and the person who insists on disagreeing with everyone both
believe nothing of interest to me. I do
not say that they believe nothing – but that whatever it is that they believe,
simply disinterests me.
So, ignoring what disinterests me, let us turn our attention
to those who choose their disagreements – whether consciously or instinctually.
It seems that any argument can be made to have high stakes, whether or not it actually does. Forgive me if this is your particular pet
debate, but I’m going to use it as an example.
- It can be said that if free will were the way that Christian salvation occurs, this negates God’s divine plan, and leaves him waiting in heaven, wringing His hands (metaphorically) hoping that mankind accepts the gift He has offered.
- The other side says that if predestination were the way that Christian salvation occurs, this leaves mankind as robots, controlled by the impersonal marionette strings of a deity unconcerned with our choices.
What I think is that both sides have charged up the high
stakes of their argument so that if you disagree with their side, the consequences
are astronomical. This can be done with
virtually anything. Unless you believe
this one particular way, it means (x) which means (x) which means the nature of
God has changed.
All of these assume that unless these questions are answered
sufficiently, the world has fallen apart.
Let me assure you – the world rests on Christ, and on nothing else. As believers, we firmly stand united that
salvation is provided by Christ. Rather
than argue about the mysterious method by which Christ has come to save us, let
each of us apply ourselves to loving each other and obeying God.
I have known of very few people who have ever been argued or
debated into the kingdom of God. But I
have known many, countless masses, which have been loved into the kingdom of
God – myself included. If you are faced
with the choice to either argue with someone over the minutia of the way by
which God has come to save us or to love that person and meet them where they
are – I urge you to choose the latter.
This brought tears to my eyes. I have always loved you sweet Stephen but this brought me to love the man you have become. I admire your dedication to God and helping others get close to God.
ReplyDeleteAww, thank you so much! That means a lot :) Love you back Aunt Jo :)
DeleteI have felt the same way about the whole free will vs. predestination debate. I have personally come to a moderate stance on the issue, allowing for both to work in a complex (and not altogether understood) manner, but it is an issue where I acknowledge that I may be wrong, and an issue that I do not hold to be as important (or high-stakes) as many in the church have made it. I am glad that you hold the same view. You stated it quite elegantly.
ReplyDeleteI rather love that the God we serve operates in "a complex (and not altogether understood) manner." :) That God does not fit inside our minds is one of the most compelling reasons for Him. A god that fits inside my mind - since I know firsthand how small a space that is - would be a very, very small god. Thank you for your comment! When I see that someone has commented on a post of mine, it brightens my day :)
Delete